Via the Blogfather, a well-written piece in the WaPo tells the story of our battlebots and the troops who work with them. It sounds rather familiar to anyone who grew up on Keith Laumer's SF stories of the Bolos , gigantic autonomous battle tanks of the future. Laumer wrote in the 60s, when the images of WWII armor battles still lingered, when counterinsurgency and asymmetric warfare were still minor military specialties, and before the miniaturizing effects of Moore's Law had really kicked in. A real 21st century PackBot would be dust under the ten foot wide treads of a Bolo Mark XXVIII. What's in common between fiction and fact is the tendency of the warriors to give names, ranks and even decorations to the bots, and go well beyond the call of duty in attempting to preserve and repair them. Perhaps unsurprising given the tendency of teamwork under stress to create strong relationships- and a phenomenon fairly well know in the literature. Back in the day... (flashback dissolve) I and a team of folks at Apple showed that you could get people to attribute human emotions to a 32x32 pixel black and white icon fronting for a simple database algorithm ( skip to 'Guides' heading here ). Then a couple of Stanford profs systematically showed just how simple it is to get someone to project human motivations and social roles onto computing or communications devices, with very modest conference phone call mounts of cueing.

Click Here

Normally, people just show up. They show up at work, or at a conference. They show up on vacation or even sometimes they show up at home. They aren't doing anything special, they're just doing. Well, I spent the day with several hundred enthusiastic people. This group, led by Jennifer Young, didn't just show up. They arrived. They were purposeful and positive and prepared and in a hurry... but in a good way. It didn't cost anything. It didn't take any more effort (in fact, it probably ended up being less of an effort.) They got more out of me, more out of each other, more out encryption software email f the day. Enthusiasm has a lot to be said for it.

Via the Blogfather, a well-written piece in the WaPo tells the story of our battlebots and the troops who work with them. It sounds rather familiar to anyone who grew up on Keith Laumer's SF stories of the Bolos , gigantic autonomous battle tanks of the future. Laumer wrote in the 60s, when the images of WWII armor battles still lingered, when counterinsurgency and asymmetric warfare were still minor military specialties, and before the miniaturizing effects of Moore's Law had really kicked in. A real 21st century PackBot would be dust under the ten bio freeze oot wide treads of a Bolo Mark XXVIII. What's in common between fiction and fact is the tendency of the warriors to give names, ranks and even decorations to the bots, and go well beyond the call of duty in attempting to preserve and repair them. Perhaps unsurprising given the tendency of teamwork under stress to create strong relationships- and a phenomenon fairly well know in the literature. Back in the day... (flashback dissolve) I and a team of folks at Apple showed that you could get people to attribute human emotions to a 32x32 pixel black and white icon fronting for a simple database algorithm ( skip to 'Guides' heading here ). Then a couple of Stanford profs systematically showed just how simple it is to get someone to project human motivations and social roles onto computing or communications devices, with very modest amounts of cueing.

Via the Blogfather, a well-written piece in the WaPo tells the story of our battlebots and the troops who work with them. It sounds rather familiar to anyone who grew up on Keith Laumer's SF stories of the Bolos , gigantic autonomous battle tanks of the future. Laumer wrote in the 60s, when the images of WWII armor battles still lingered, when counterinsurgency and asymmetric warfare were still minor military specialties, and before the miniaturizing effects of Moore's Law had really kicked in. A real 21st century PackBot would be dust under the ten foot wide treads of a Bolo Mark XXVIII. What's in common between web hosting paypal iction and fact is the tendency of the warriors to give names, ranks and even decorations to the bots, and go well beyond the call of duty in attempting to preserve and repair them. Perhaps unsurprising given the tendency of teamwork under stress to create strong relationships- and a phenomenon fairly well know in the literature. Back in the day... (flashback dissolve) I and a team of folks at Apple showed that you could get people to attribute human emotions to a 32x32 pixel black and white icon fronting for a simple database algorithm ( skip to 'Guides' heading here ). Then a couple of Stanford profs systematically showed just how simple it is to get someone to project human motivations and social roles onto computing or communications devices, with very modest amounts of cueing.

Via the Blogfather, a well-written piece in the WaPo tells the story of our battlebots and the troops who work with them. It sounds rather familiar to anyone who grew up on Keith Laumer's SF stories of the Bolos , gigantic autonomous battle tanks of the future. Laumer wrote parental internet filter n the 60s, when the images of WWII armor battles still lingered, when counterinsurgency and asymmetric warfare were still minor military specialties, and before the miniaturizing effects of Moore's Law had really kicked in. A real 21st century PackBot would be dust under the ten foot wide treads of a Bolo Mark XXVIII. What's in common between fiction and fact is the tendency of the warriors to give names, ranks and even decorations to the bots, and go well beyond the call of duty in attempting to preserve and repair them. Perhaps unsurprising given the tendency of teamwork under stress to create strong relationships- and a phenomenon fairly well know in the literature. Back in the day... (flashback dissolve) I and a team of folks at Apple showed that you could get people to attribute human emotions to a 32x32 pixel black and white icon fronting for a simple database algorithm ( skip to 'Guides' heading here ). Then a couple of Stanford profs systematically showed just how simple it is to get someone to project human motivations and social roles onto computing or communications devices, with very modest amounts of cueing.

Via the Blogfather, a well-written piece in the WaPo tells the story of our battlebots and the troops who work with them. It sounds rather familiar to anyone who grew up on Keith Laumer's SF stories of the Bolos , gigantic autonomous battle tanks of the future. Laumer wrote in the 60s, when the images of WWII armor battles still lingered, when counterinsurgency car parking london gatwick nd asymmetric warfare were still minor military specialties, and before the miniaturizing effects of Moore's Law had really kicked in. A real 21st century PackBot would be dust under the ten foot wide treads of a Bolo Mark XXVIII. What's in common between fiction and fact is the tendency of the warriors to give names, ranks and even decorations to the bots, and go well beyond the call of duty in attempting to preserve and repair them. Perhaps unsurprising given the tendency of teamwork under stress to create strong relationships- and a phenomenon fairly well know in the literature. Back in the day... (flashback dissolve) I and a team of folks at Apple showed that you could get people to attribute human emotions to a 32x32 pixel black and white icon fronting for a simple database algorithm ( skip to 'Guides' heading here ). Then a couple of Stanford profs systematically showed just how simple it is to get someone to project human motivations and social roles onto computing or communications devices, with very modest amounts of cueing.

"The female, equipped with a Defense far superior in polymorphous ingenuities to the rather simple Attack of the male, developed, and perfected, the Diversion Subterfuge. The first manifestation of this remarkable phenomenon was fudge-making." ( James Thurber: Writings and Drawings ) " Seems to me that MSNBC needs to remove a lot more than "MS" from the network to improve its image ," writes Michelle Malkin re the cadaverish free roulette systems on Imus's latest gratuitous trashing of a woman who doesn't please his eye, in this case MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer : That skank has to spend three hours with makeup in the morning . . . Who's she kidding? . . . Plus, she's dumber than dirt . . . Oh, my God, what a pig. Who's a pig? 'Can't help but wonder how Deirdre feels about her husband's venomous misogyny. We used to watch "Imus in the Morning" when the old boy was trashing Bill "it depends upon what your definition of is is" Clinton years ago but haven't been tempted since GW moved into the White House. Presumably, Imus's ratings are still healthy amongst a subset of our fellow Americans (misogyny is universal and can rear its ugly head at any time), since the best the bottom-line guys at MSNBC -- soon to be The NBC News Channel -- can muster in his defense is "We have expressed our displeasure to Don.

Here's some food for thought in regards to online training development , Jared Spool, over at BrainSparks looks at an interesting question about the use of underlined and non-underlined links . The norm in web design, since it's start, is that links are identified by an underline. Adept web surfers troll for underlined text, since that text is generally considered a link. These same surfers however, have been able to identify links that weren't underlined just by moving their mouse anti spam outlook ver the text and watching their mouse react. Yes, the boring convention of underlined text is a reliable option for formatting your links, but CSS offers the ability to treat links in several ways. You could have a background color on your links, put a border around them, have them appear bold on a hover, whatever floats your boat. I think the key to effective link aesthetics is, like all other design tactics, keeping things consistent. In his article, Jared shows examples of sites that weren't consistent with their linking, some underlined and others not, which confused the users. One definitive option I'd like to offer is the use of color. Ordinary links are underlined and in blue, which sets them apart from the black text. Bearing that in mind, use a color for your links that has enough contrast from the surrounding text to be recognized as a link, even if it isn't underlined. Another way to confirm that a non-underlined link is a link is to use the hover pseudo class in CSS.

Normally, people just show up. They show how to uninstall a program p at work, or at a conference. They show up on vacation or even sometimes they show up at home. They aren't doing anything special, they're just doing. Well, I spent the day with several hundred enthusiastic people. This group, led by Jennifer Young, didn't just show up. They arrived. They were purposeful and positive and prepared and in a hurry... but in a good way. It didn't cost anything. It didn't take any more effort (in fact, it probably ended up being less of an effort.) They got more out of me, more out of each other, more out of the day. Enthusiasm has a lot to be said for it.

Here's some food for thought in regards to online training development , Jared Spool, over at BrainSparks looks at an interesting question about the use of underlined and non-underlined links . The norm in web design, since it's start, is that links are identified by an underline. Adept web surfers troll for underlined text, since that text is generally considered a link. These same surfers whois server owever, have been able to identify links that weren't underlined just by moving their mouse over the text and watching their mouse react. Yes, the boring convention of underlined text is a reliable option for formatting your links, but CSS offers the ability to treat links in several ways. You could have a background color on your links, put a border around them, have them appear bold on a hover, whatever floats your boat. I think the key to effective link aesthetics is, like all other design tactics, keeping things consistent. In his article, Jared shows examples of sites that weren't consistent with their linking, some underlined and others not, which confused the users. One definitive option I'd like to offer is the use of color. Ordinary links are underlined and in blue, which sets them apart from the black text. Bearing that in mind, use a color for your links that has enough contrast from the surrounding text to be recognized as a link, even if it isn't underlined. Another way to confirm that a non-underlined link is a link is to use the hover pseudo class in CSS.