The following was sent to George Tenet today in care of his publisher. The letter, written by a group of former intelligence officers, reflects disgust with George Tenet's effort to burnish his image with his new "tell" all book. 28 April 2007 Mr. George Tenet c/o Harper Collins Publishers 10 East 53rd Street 8 th Floor New York City, New York 10022 ATTN: Ms. Tina Andredis Dear Mr. Tenet: We write to you on the occasion of the release of your book, At the Center of the Storm . You are on the record complaining about the “damage to your reputation”. In our view the damage to your reputation is inconsequential compared to the harm your actions have caused for the U.S. soldiers engaged in combat in Iraq and the national security of the United States. We believe you have a moral obligation to return backup online storage the Medal of Freedom you received from President George Bush. We also call for you to dedicate a significant percentage of the royalties from your book to the U.S. soldiers and their families who have been killed and wounded in Iraq. We agree with you that Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration officials took the United States to war for flimsy reasons. We agree that the war of choice in Iraq was ill-advised and wrong headed. But your lament that you are a victim in a process you helped direct is self-serving, misleading and, as head of the intelligence community, an admission of failed leadership. You were not a victim.

The following was sent to George Tenet today in care of his publisher. The letter, written by a group of former intelligence officers, reflects disgust with George Tenet's effort to burnish his image with his new "tell" all book. 28 April 2007 Mr. George Tenet c/o Harper Collins Publishers cape canaveral deep sea fishing 10 East 53rd Street 8 th Floor New York City, New York 10022 ATTN: Ms. Tina Andredis Dear Mr. Tenet: We write to you on the occasion of the release of your book, At the Center of the Storm . You are on the record complaining about the “damage to your reputation”. In our view the damage to your reputation is inconsequential compared to the harm your actions have caused for the U.S. soldiers engaged in combat in Iraq and the national security of the United States. We believe you have a moral obligation to return the Medal of Freedom you received from President George Bush. We also call for you to dedicate a significant percentage of the royalties from your book to the U.S. soldiers and their families who have been killed and wounded in Iraq. We agree with you that Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration officials took the United States to war for flimsy reasons. We agree that the war of choice in Iraq was ill-advised and wrong headed. But your lament that you are a victim in a process you helped direct is self-serving, misleading and, as head of the intelligence community, an admission of failed leadership. You were not a victim.

That's it. I've had it. Again. There's no way I'd ever make it as a Marketeer. I almost wasn't going to write anything about this particular topic because my response can (and probably should) easily be perceived as and retorted against as a pissy little marketing match between competitors. Chu don't like it, Chu don't gotta read it, capice? Sue me for telling the truth. {strike that, as someone probably will} However, this sort of blatant exhalation of so-called revolutionary security product and architectural advances disguised as prophecy is just so, well, recockulous, that I can't stand it. I found it funny that the Anti-Hoff (Stiennon) managed to slip another patented advertising editorial Captain Obvious press piece in SC Magazine regarding what can only be described as the natural evolution of network security products that plug into -- but are not natively -- routing or switching architectures. I don't really mind that, but to suggest that somehow this is an original concept is just disingenuous. Besides trying to wean Fortinet away from the classification as UTM devices (which Richard clearly hates to be associated with) by suggesting that UTM should be renamed as "Flexible Security Platform," he does a fine job of asserting that a "geologic shift" (I can only assume he means tectonic) discover niagara is coming soon in the so-called fourth generation of security products.

The following was sent to George Tenet today in care of his publisher. The letter, written by a group of former intelligence officers, reflects disgust with George Tenet's effort to burnish his image with his new "tell" all book. 28 April 2007 Mr. George Tenet c/o Harper Collins Publishers 10 East 53rd Street 8 th Floor New York City, New York 10022 ATTN: Ms. Tina Andredis Dear Mr. Tenet: We write to you on the occasion of the release of your book, At the Center of the Storm . You are on the record complaining about the “damage to your reputation”. In our view the damage to your reputation is inconsequential compared to the harm your actions have caused for the U.S. soldiers engaged in combat in Iraq and the national security of the United States. We believe you have a free email accounts moral obligation to return the Medal of Freedom you received from President George Bush. We also call for you to dedicate a significant percentage of the royalties from your book to the U.S. soldiers and their families who have been killed and wounded in Iraq. We agree with you that Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration officials took the United States to war for flimsy reasons. We agree that the war of choice in Iraq was ill-advised and wrong headed. But your lament that you are a victim in a process you helped direct is self-serving, misleading and, as head of the intelligence community, an admission of failed leadership. You were not a victim.

Under Mississippi and Federal law, transfers of assets by an Medicaid applicant within 60 months prior to a Medicaid application will result in a penalty of ineligibility. Congress does not want you to move into a nursing home on Monday, give all your money to your children (or whomever) on Tuesday, and qualify for Medicaid on Wednesday. So it has imposed a penalty on people who transfer assets without receiving fair value in return. These restrictions, already severe, have been made even harsher by enactment emergency flight of the DRA. This penalty is a period of time during which the person transferring the assets will be ineligible for Medicaid. The penalty period is determined by dividing the amount transferred by what Medicaid determines to be the average private pay cost of a nursing home in your state. In Mississippi, this divisor is $4,600. Example: For example, in Mississippi, where the average monthly cost of care has been determined to be $4,600, and you give away property worth $46,000, you will be ineligible for benefits for 10 months ($46,000 ÷ $4,600= 10). Another way to look at the above example is that for every $4,600 transferred, an applicant would be ineligible for Medicaid nursing home benefits for one month. In theory, there is no limit on the number of months a person can be ineligible.

Greg Van Kirk and his team of volunteers comprise Community Enterprise Solutions the not for profit he co-founded with fellow Guatemala Peace Corps Volunteer George Glickley to provide loans to rural constituents While working in investment banking in New York City in 2000, Greg Van Kirk read about Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus’ micro-credit work providing loans to the poor of Bangledesh. “When I turned 30 and read about Mohammad Yunnus’ work, I knew it was now or never, so I joined the Peace Corps,” data files he said. Armed with his investment banking credibility, and accrued analytic and business skills, Van Kirk knew that what he needed was real field experience. His transformation from Peace Corps volunteer to social entrepreneur began in Nebaj, an indigenous, rural town in the mountains of Guatemala, where he found himself surrounded by nature and culture but with no facilities or centers for tourists to stay at or visit. Seeing an opportunity to help local people bring new money into the community and create new jobs, he donated his own money and solicited the support of family and friends and created five tourism-focused businesses: a restaurant, a Spanish language school, a guiding service, an Internet café, and an artisan store. Van Kirk said Jan.

One sure barometer of a president's -- or senator's or governor's -- standing with the public is the quantity, quality and creativity of bumper stickers, posters, slogans and what used to be called "Guerrilla Theater." To my way of thinking, these products and activities are often more accurate -- and definitely more entertaining -- than scientifically-conducted public opinion polls. A few examples of my favorites from yesteryear: During the 1964 horizon hobby presidential race, there was a best-selling button that had Senator Barry Goldwater's smiling face surmounted with the words, "In Your Guts You Know He's Nuts!" Back in the late 1960s, when then-California Governor Ronald Reagan was making a name for himself as the first line of defense against anti-war protesters at Berkley, there was a fast-selling poster that proclaimed, "Impeach Bonzo and his Buddy!" During the 1968 presidential election, Dick Tuck, the late "Clown Prince of Politics," lined up several dozen obviously pregnant women at a train siding, all holding placards proclaiming, "Nixon's the One!" In my more than 40 years as a political junkie, I cannot recall a time or a president who has garnered more buttons, bumper stickers or slogans than George W. Bush.

One sure barometer of a president's -- or senator's or governor's -- standing with the public is the quantity, quality and creativity of bumper stickers, posters, slogans and what used to be called "Guerrilla Theater." To my way of thinking, these products and activities are often more accurate -- and definitely more entertaining -- than scientifically-conducted public opinion polls. A few examples of my favorites from yesteryear: During the 1964 presidential race, there was a best-selling button that had Senator Barry Goldwater's smiling face surmounted with the words, "In Your Guts You Know He's Nuts!" Back in the late 1960s, when then-California Governor Ronald Reagan was making a name for himself as the first line of defense against anti-war protesters at Berkley, there leads real estate was a fast-selling poster that proclaimed, "Impeach Bonzo and his Buddy!" During the 1968 presidential election, Dick Tuck, the late "Clown Prince of Politics," lined up several dozen obviously pregnant women at a train siding, all holding placards proclaiming, "Nixon's the One!" In my more than 40 years as a political junkie, I cannot recall a time or a president who has garnered more buttons, bumper stickers or slogans than George W. Bush.

That's it. I've had it. Again. There's no way I'd ever make it as a Marketeer. I almost wasn't going to write anything about this particular topic because my response can (and probably should) easily be perceived as and retorted against as a pissy little marketing match between competitors. Chu don't like it, Chu don't gotta read it, capice? Sue me for telling the truth. {strike that, as someone probably will} However, this sort of blatant exhalation of so-called revolutionary security product and architectural advances disguised as prophecy is just so, well, recockulous, regeln roulette that I can't stand it. I found it funny that the Anti-Hoff (Stiennon) managed to slip another patented advertising editorial Captain Obvious press piece in SC Magazine regarding what can only be described as the natural evolution of network security products that plug into -- but are not natively -- routing or switching architectures. I don't really mind that, but to suggest that somehow this is an original concept is just disingenuous. Besides trying to wean Fortinet away from the classification as UTM devices (which Richard clearly hates to be associated with) by suggesting that UTM should be renamed as "Flexible Security Platform," he does a fine job of asserting that a "geologic shift" (I can only assume he means tectonic) is coming soon in the so-called fourth generation of security products.

The following was sent to George Tenet today in care of his publisher. The letter, written by a group of former intelligence officers, reflects disgust with George Tenet's effort to burnish his image with his new "tell" all book. 28 April 2007 Mr. George Tenet c/o Harper Collins Publishers 10 East 53rd Street 8 th Floor New York City, New York 10022 ATTN: Ms. Tina Andredis Dear Mr. Tenet: We write to you on the occasion trend micro pc cillin internet security 2005 of the release of your book, At the Center of the Storm . You are on the record complaining about the “damage to your reputation”. In our view the damage to your reputation is inconsequential compared to the harm your actions have caused for the U.S. soldiers engaged in combat in Iraq and the national security of the United States. We believe you have a moral obligation to return the Medal of Freedom you received from President George Bush. We also call for you to dedicate a significant percentage of the royalties from your book to the U.S. soldiers and their families who have been killed and wounded in Iraq. We agree with you that Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration officials took the United States to war for flimsy reasons. We agree that the war of choice in Iraq was ill-advised and wrong headed. But your lament that you are a victim in a process you helped direct is self-serving, misleading and, as head of the intelligence community, an admission of failed leadership. You were not a victim.

The following was sent to George Tenet today in care of his publisher. The letter, written by a group of former intelligence officers, reflects disgust with George Tenet's effort to burnish his image with his new "tell" all book. 28 April 2007 Mr. George Tenet c/o Harper Collins Publishers 10 East 53rd Street 8 th Floor New York City, New York 10022 ATTN: Ms. Tina Andredis Dear Mr. Tenet: We write to you on the occasion of the release of your book, At the Center of the Storm . You are on the record complaining free ocean screensaver about the “damage to your reputation”. In our view the damage to your reputation is inconsequential compared to the harm your actions have caused for the U.S. soldiers engaged in combat in Iraq and the national security of the United States. We believe you have a moral obligation to return the Medal of Freedom you received from President George Bush. We also call for you to dedicate a significant percentage of the royalties from your book to the U.S. soldiers and their families who have been killed and wounded in Iraq. We agree with you that Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration officials took the United States to war for flimsy reasons. We agree that the war of choice in Iraq was ill-advised and wrong headed. But your lament that you are a victim in a process you helped direct is self-serving, misleading and, as head of the intelligence community, an admission of failed leadership. You were not a victim.

The following was sent to George Tenet today in care of his publisher. The letter, written by a group of former intelligence officers, reflects disgust with George Tenet's effort to burnish his image with his new "tell" all book. 28 April 2007 Mr. George Tenet c/o Harper Collins Publishers 10 East 53rd Street 8 th Floor New York City, New York 10022 ATTN: Ms. Tina Andredis Dear Mr. Tenet: We write to you on the occasion of the release of your book, At the Center of the Storm . You are on the record complaining about the “damage to your reputation”. In our view the damage to your reputation is inconsequential compared to the harm spyware killer software your actions have caused for the U.S. soldiers engaged in combat in Iraq and the national security of the United States. We believe you have a moral obligation to return the Medal of Freedom you received from President George Bush. We also call for you to dedicate a significant percentage of the royalties from your book to the U.S. soldiers and their families who have been killed and wounded in Iraq. We agree with you that Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration officials took the United States to war for flimsy reasons. We agree that the war of choice in Iraq was ill-advised and wrong headed. But your lament that you are a victim in a process you helped direct is self-serving, misleading and, as head of the intelligence community, an admission of failed leadership. You were not a victim.

One sure barometer of a president's -- or senator's or governor's -- standing with the public is the quantity, quality and creativity of bumper stickers, posters, slogans and what used to be called "Guerrilla Theater." To my way of thinking, these products and activities are often more accurate -- and definitely more entertaining -- than scientifically-conducted public opinion polls. A few examples of my favorites from yesteryear: During the 1964 presidential race, there was a best-selling button that had Senator Barry Goldwater's smiling face surmounted with the words, "In Your Guts You Know He's Nuts!" Back in the late 1960s, when then-California vans austin Governor Ronald Reagan was making a name for himself as the first line of defense against anti-war protesters at Berkley, there was a fast-selling poster that proclaimed, "Impeach Bonzo and his Buddy!" During the 1968 presidential election, Dick Tuck, the late "Clown Prince of Politics," lined up several dozen obviously pregnant women at a train siding, all holding placards proclaiming, "Nixon's the One!" In my more than 40 years as a political junkie, I cannot recall a time or a president who has garnered more buttons, bumper stickers or slogans than George W. Bush.

That's it. I've had it. Again. There's no way I'd ever make it as a Marketeer. I almost wasn't going to write anything about this particular topic because my response can (and probably should) easily be perceived as and retorted against as a pissy little marketing match between competitors. Chu don't like it, Chu don't gotta read it, capice? Sue me for telling the truth. {strike that, as someone probably will} However, this sort of blatant exhalation of so-called revolutionary security product and architectural advances disguised as prophecy is just so, well, recockulous, that I can't stand it. I found it funny that the Anti-Hoff (Stiennon) managed to slip another patented advertising editorial lake view rentals Captain Obvious press piece in SC Magazine regarding what can only be described as the natural evolution of network security products that plug into -- but are not natively -- routing or switching architectures. I don't really mind that, but to suggest that somehow this is an original concept is just disingenuous. Besides trying to wean Fortinet away from the classification as UTM devices (which Richard clearly hates to be associated with) by suggesting that UTM should be renamed as "Flexible Security Platform," he does a fine job of asserting that a "geologic shift" (I can only assume he means tectonic) is coming soon in the so-called fourth generation of security products.

Click Here

That's it. I've had it. Again. There's no way I'd ever make it as a Marketeer. I almost wasn't going to write anything about this particular topic because my response can (and probably should) easily be perceived as and retorted against as a pissy little marketing match between competitors. Chu don't like it, Chu don't gotta read it, capice? Sue me for telling the truth. {strike that, as someone probably will} However, this sort of blatant exhalation of so-called revolutionary security product and architectural advances disguised as prophecy is just so, well, recockulous, that I can't stand it. I good credit score found it funny that the Anti-Hoff (Stiennon) managed to slip another patented advertising editorial Captain Obvious press piece in SC Magazine regarding what can only be described as the natural evolution of network security products that plug into -- but are not natively -- routing or switching architectures. I don't really mind that, but to suggest that somehow this is an original concept is just disingenuous. Besides trying to wean Fortinet away from the classification as UTM devices (which Richard clearly hates to be associated with) by suggesting that UTM should be renamed as "Flexible Security Platform," he does a fine job of asserting that a "geologic shift" (I can only assume he means tectonic) is coming soon in the so-called fourth generation of security products.

That's it. I've had it. Again. There's no way I'd ever make it as a Marketeer. I almost wasn't going to write anything about this particular topic because my response can (and probably should) easily be perceived as and retorted against as a pissy little marketing match between competitors. Chu don't like it, Chu don't gotta read it, capice? Sue me for telling the truth. {strike that, as someone probably will} However, this sort of blatant exhalation of so-called revolutionary security product and architectural advances disguised as prophecy is just so, well, recockulous, that I can't stand it. I found fundraising ideas it funny that the Anti-Hoff (Stiennon) managed to slip another patented advertising editorial Captain Obvious press piece in SC Magazine regarding what can only be described as the natural evolution of network security products that plug into -- but are not natively -- routing or switching architectures. I don't really mind that, but to suggest that somehow this is an original concept is just disingenuous. Besides trying to wean Fortinet away from the classification as UTM devices (which Richard clearly hates to be associated with) by suggesting that UTM should be renamed as "Flexible Security Platform," he does a fine job of asserting that a "geologic shift" (I can only assume he means tectonic) is coming soon in the so-called fourth generation of security products.

The following was sent to George Tenet today in care of his publisher. The letter, written by a group of former intelligence officers, reflects disgust with stamina band flex George Tenet's effort to burnish his image with his new "tell" all book. 28 April 2007 Mr. George Tenet c/o Harper Collins Publishers 10 East 53rd Street 8 th Floor New York City, New York 10022 ATTN: Ms. Tina Andredis Dear Mr. Tenet: We write to you on the occasion of the release of your book, At the Center of the Storm . You are on the record complaining about the “damage to your reputation”. In our view the damage to your reputation is inconsequential compared to the harm your actions have caused for the U.S. soldiers engaged in combat in Iraq and the national security of the United States. We believe you have a moral obligation to return the Medal of Freedom you received from President George Bush. We also call for you to dedicate a significant percentage of the royalties from your book to the U.S. soldiers and their families who have been killed and wounded in Iraq. We agree with you that Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration officials took the United States to war for flimsy reasons. We agree that the war of choice in Iraq was ill-advised and wrong headed. But your lament that you are a victim in a process you helped direct is self-serving, misleading and, as head of the intelligence community, an admission of failed leadership. You were not a victim.